Your team gets AI on real systems. You get the audit trail.
Your team connects Claude, Claude Cowork, or any MCP-compatible client to the same Omnafy Gateway your agents use. Same permissions, same audit, same approval policy.
Why route staff through the gateway
The alternative is staff pasting company data into whatever tool they have open. Routing them through the gateway gives them more capability and gives you a record of it.
For your staff
- Real operations on real systems, not copy-paste into a chat window
- Only the tools their role allows, so nothing is overwhelming
- Answers grounded in live company data rather than a stale export
For you
- Every action attributed to a named person
- Risky operations still route through approval
- One policy layer covering humans and agents alike
For the rollout
- The fastest way to feel what an agent workforce is like
- Runs while the autonomous agents are still ramping up
- The usage shows you which workflows to automate first
The same rules, whoever is calling
A person in an MCP client and an autonomous agent are both just callers with an identity. The gateway does not care which one you are; it applies the same scope, the same tiering, and the same audit.
Scoped per seat
- Permissions follow the person's role in your access model
- Tools outside that scope are never listed
- Revoking a seat revokes the access immediately
Audited per action
- Inputs, outputs, and outcome recorded per call
- Attributed to the individual, not a shared service account
- Per-seat cost metering alongside agent runs
Start where your team already works.
No new interface to learn and no migration. Your staff keep the client they like; it simply gains a governed set of tools pointed at your systems.